<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Armani&#8217;s RED makes Kate Moss black for your green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://annansi.com/blog/2006/09/armanis-red-makes-kate-moss-black-for-your-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://annansi.com/blog/2006/09/armanis-red-makes-kate-moss-black-for-your-green/</link>
	<description>African business and culture trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: callie</title>
		<link>http://annansi.com/blog/2006/09/armanis-red-makes-kate-moss-black-for-your-green/comment-page-1/#comment-109833</link>
		<dc:creator>callie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annansi.com/blog/2006/09/armanis-red-makes-kate-moss-black-for-your-green/#comment-109833</guid>
		<description>She looks hot painted black too. God. Not to mention shes also gold, whats next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks hot painted black too. God. Not to mention shes also gold, whats next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Wolf</title>
		<link>http://annansi.com/blog/2006/09/armanis-red-makes-kate-moss-black-for-your-green/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annansi.com/blog/2006/09/armanis-red-makes-kate-moss-black-for-your-green/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Are consumers and branding the issue here?  IsnÂ´t the problem the fact that a breed of racism popular back in the 1890s is suddenly considered publishable again?  Only now we have Kate Moss playing a sexualized starving African woman in place of minstrel shows....the most CHARITABLE implication beting that Africans themselves, of course, have neither bodies, brains nor voices with which to represent themselves.  We can only hope that the inside of the magazine contained a healthy number of drawings of evil-looking Arabs with big noses taking over the globe, since such cartoons also seem to be making a comeback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are consumers and branding the issue here?  IsnÂ´t the problem the fact that a breed of racism popular back in the 1890s is suddenly considered publishable again?  Only now we have Kate Moss playing a sexualized starving African woman in place of minstrel shows&#8230;.the most CHARITABLE implication beting that Africans themselves, of course, have neither bodies, brains nor voices with which to represent themselves.  We can only hope that the inside of the magazine contained a healthy number of drawings of evil-looking Arabs with big noses taking over the globe, since such cartoons also seem to be making a comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: annansi.com @ 2012-05-17 04:55:30 -->
